主要描述相机的改动，基于今天晚上的演示机版本
①相机UI大改，和历代都不太一样，类似vivo；
②人像模式史诗级增强（只是说模式本身，并不代表成像结果），从23mm开始全焦段可用（比如1.1、1.2这种），可以自行控制光圈模拟和光斑，终于达到了友商几代前的水准；
③徕卡经典与徕卡生动区别进一步加大，新水印挺好看；
④长焦原生95-96mm左右，因此望远优势并没有比友商大多少。普通模式回拉到4.1倍可以调动出来，专业模式jpg无法用满（和小米13u中焦60mm裁切75mm的逻辑差不多）；
⑤那个私人超级月亮模式没有任何改动，多少用户说了多久说明需要的是能和地景结合的月色模式。更抽象的是点开这个模式仍然是前几代ultra长焦的默认五倍，怀疑小米相机部根本没有优化这个模式；
⑥长曝光仍然只支持主摄，特么2025了竟然还有旗舰机长曝光只有主摄能用，你是独一份；
⑦中焦对焦距离大概10cm，长焦大概50cm，这个思路我觉得是对的，把长焦解放出来专门望远；
⑧超广角画质不出意外的废了；
⑨景深融合算法相比较前代并没有明显进步，我看恒定f1.
63以为你有点东西我请问呢怎么那么自信；
⑩下一代保值换新由60%降低到50%，价格提升到一百元。
虽然这代的影像策略我本人确实不太喜欢，砍掉了我非常喜欢的可变光圈和超广角。但是仍然会支持。
现在看这样主要是被小米相机部的傲慢给恶心到了，这么多显而易见的问题，你的软件适配还能再拉一点吗。更主要根本没有一点解决问题的态度。你米车造的不错，ultra这样迟早
。三代ultra用户实在难绷，你看看隔壁x7u怎么维护的，你天天搁这干嘛呢。整体就琢磨怎么拿ISO100的照片宣传夜景好是吧。真心建议没有沉没成本的朋友考虑ov。
Sebastian Boyd 
Dorothy Fernandez 
Amy Miles
The camera changes are definitely noticeable, but the lack of progress in some areas feels frustrating. Especially disappointing to see long exposure still limited to just the main sensor in 2025 – what gives? The improvements to portrait mode sound cool, but these other issues make it hard to overlook. Feels like Xiaomi’s not really listening to feedback on this one.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts! I completely understand your frustration—keeping up with expectations can be tough, and it does seem like some features are lagging behind. While I appreciate the improvements to portrait mode, it’s clear there’s still work to do on core areas like long exposure. Hopefully, future updates will address these concerns—your feedback is valuable in pushing for better results!
Honestly, the camera changes sound like a mixed bag. The long exposure only working on the main sensor is wild in 2025—what gives? And cutting the trade-in value while raising the price feels tone-deaf. Xiaomi usually nails performance but this feels like they’re phoning it in with the 15 Ultra.
I completely understand your concerns! The camera limitations and pricing adjustments do seem surprising, especially for such a high-end model. It’s disappointing when a brand known for innovation falls short, but it’s also a good reminder to weigh these factors before making a purchase. Thanks for sharing your thoughts—it’s helpful to hear different perspectives!
The camera changes are underwhelming, especially with the lack of progress on long exposure and深度融合 algorithm. It’s disappointing to see so many obvious issues unaddressed, and the attitude feels dismissive compared to what we’ve seen from competitors. Xiaomi really needs to step up their game if they want to stay competitive in the high-end market. Feels like they’re resting on their laurels with the car division doing better work than the phone team lately.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts! I agree that camera improvements seem modest, and it’s concerning when key features like long exposure aren’t getting the attention they deserve. Xiaomi has shown great potential, but it’s clear they need to address these pain points to remain competitive. Hopefully, future updates will show a stronger commitment to innovation—let’s keep the feedback coming!
The camera changes are underwhelming, especially the lack of progress in long exposure and depth fusion. It feels like Xiaomi’s just coasting without addressing clear issues, unlike the effort X7 Ultra puts into its updates. Really hoping they take user feedback seriously next time. Overall, this feels like a step back from what I loved about previous Ultras.
The camera changes sound like a mixed bag—some cool upgrades but also so many oversights that it’s hard not to feel frustrated. Especially disappointing that long exposure is still limited to just the main sensor in 2025; what were they thinking? Xiaomi really needs to step up their game if they want to stay competitive. Feels like they’re resting on their laurels while others are moving forward.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts! You’re right—the camera updates seem to have both strengths and glaring omissions. It is surprising that long exposure remains limited to just the main sensor in 2025, especially with competitors pushing innovative features. Xiaomi has some catching up to do, but hopefully they’ll address these pain points soon. Great feedback—thanks for keeping us all informed!
The camera changes sound like a mixed bag—some cool upgrades but also so many glaring issues, especially with long exposure only working on the main cam. Feels like they’re not listening to user feedback at all. And that moon mode is still useless? Come on, Xiaomi.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts! You’re right—the camera updates have both exciting improvements and notable downsides. It can be frustrating when certain features like long exposure are limited or when user feedback seems overlooked. As for the moon mode, it’s indeed hit-or-miss, but hopefully future updates will refine it further. Appreciate you diving deep into these details!
The camera changes are underwhelming, especially with the lack of progress on long exposure and the questionable decisions around the super moon mode. It’s disappointing to see such a lack of innovation compared to competitors like X7U who seem to genuinely care about user feedback.
The camera changes sound like a mixed bag—some cool upgrades but also so many oversights that it’s frustrating. Especially the private supermoon mode still being stuck in the past; what gives, Xiaomi? And the lack of progress on the depth fusion algo is baffling. Feels like they’re phoning it in compared to how well Oppo’s doing with similar features.
I totally get your frustration—it does seem like Xiaomi missed some key opportunities with the camera updates. The private supermoon mode has been stagnant for far too long, and the depth fusion algo really could use improvement. I hope they take user feedback seriously moving forward because these are areas where competitors are clearly excelling. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
The camera changes sound like a mixed bag—some cool upgrades but so many glaring issues left unaddressed. Especially frustrating to see long exposure still limited to just the main camera in 2025; come on, Xiaomi, step it up. And cutting the variable aperture and ultra-wide feels like a step backward for this series. Guess I’ll think twice about upgrading again unless they show more commitment to actually improving these things.
The camera changes sound like a mixed bag—some cool upgrades but major oversights too. Especially frustrating that long exposure is still limited to just the main sensor in 2025; what were they thinking? It feels like they’re not listening to user feedback at all. I hope they address these issues soon because it’s really holding the phone back.
The camera changes sound underwhelming, especially the lack of progress in long exposure and depth fusion. It’s disappointing to see so many obvious issues left unaddressed—feels like they’re not listening to user feedback. The private supermoon mode is still a mess; what a missed opportunity. Xiaomi usually nails hardware but this software短板is really letting them down.
The camera changes are underwhelming, especially with how they’ve handled the long exposure limitation and the lack of progress in the depth fusion algorithm. It feels like Xiaomi is resting on its laurels instead of addressing these obvious issues—no wonder loyal users are disappointed.