昨天佳能发布了佳能R50V，上个月佳能发布了PoeerShot V1(简称V1)，一起来看看怎么选[doge]
[一R] 在画幅上R50和R50V都是半画幅，V1是1.4英寸的CMOS
[二R] 有效像素R50V和R50都是2420W，V1是2230W
[三R] R50V和R50都没机身防抖，V1有五轴防抖
[四R] 这3台相机都没热靴，只有佳能自己的多功能接口，就是不能用第三方闪光灯只能用佳能原厂闪光灯或者用转接器，同时V1和R50V没有机顶闪
[五R] 电池续航上3台相机大差不差，用的都是E17电池
[六R] 对焦系统处理器3台相机保持一致
[七R] 屏幕上R50＞R50V＝V1，3台相机都是翻转屏
[八R] 视频规格上R50支持6K超采，无裁切4K30P
R50V支持6K超采，裁切4K60P和无裁切4K30P，支持Log3
V1支持5.
7超采，裁切4K60P和无裁切4K30P，支持Log3
[九R] V1采用的是不可更换镜头设计，机身自带的等效16-50成像效果要比R50V的RF-S 14-30和RF-S 18-45效果好，但是R50V和R50换个好镜头效果同样能完爆V1
那么这3台相机应该怎么选呢？
1️⃣ R50和R50V，这两台相机其实硬件参数一模一样，不管是CMOS，重量，对焦系统，续航等几乎都保持一致。只是从设计理念来说R50V是一个适合视频拍摄的人体工学设计，整台相机的设计重点都是为了视频拍摄而准备，机身的各种按钮，转盘，散热，麦克风，供电，双三脚架接口和竖屏拍摄还有各种慢/快记录动作模式都为了视频录制和直播重新设计，而R50则是普通微单的风格，更适合日常的扫街拍照。
这2台相机个人的建议是，如果有直播或者视频Vlog重度使用者则首选R50V，如果只是日常照片拍摄则选着R50
2️⃣ V1的话则是一台不可更换镜头的卡片机，定位同样是视频直播机。和R50V对比缺点就是CMOS太小，只有1.4英寸。优点则是更便携。在R50V使用套机14-30镜头的前提下，V1的综合表现会更好，如果R50V用上更好的镜头那么V1则比不上R50V
总结下[满月R]
有直播和视频Vlog需求的首选R50V
有直播和视频Vlog需求同时想要便携不想更换镜头的则选V1
如果只是单纯拍照的话则选择R50即可
看完这个，小伙伴们知道这3台相机怎么选了吗？[doge]
Isabella Campbell 
Mason Jensen 
Gemma King
I think the V1 could be a great choice for someone who wants an all-in-one, portable option without worrying about lenses. But if I were doing more serious video work, the R50V’s features seem way more appealing despite the similar specs to the R50.
Absolutely agree! The V1’s compact design and built-in lens make it perfect for casual shooters or travelers looking for convenience. For serious videography, though, the R50V’s advanced features and versatility feel like a smarter investment. Thanks for sharing your thoughts—it’s always helpful to hear how others weigh these options!
I think the V1 could be a great choice for someone who needs something super portable and doesn’t want to mess with lens changes, but its small sensor might be a dealbreaker for serious videographers. The R50V really seems like it was built with content creators in mind, especially with that focus on video features and ergonomics. Overall, this guide is super helpful for understanding where each camera shines!
I think the R50V is a great choice for vloggers since its design really focuses on video features, but I wonder how well it performs in low light compared to the R50. For those who don’t want to mess with lenses at all, the V1 seems like a solid option despite its smaller sensor size. Overall, it’s helpful to have these clear comparisons when deciding between these models!
Absolutely! The R50V does handle low-light situations better than the R50 thanks to its improved sensor and autofocus system, though the R50 still holds up well for still photography. And you’re right about the V1—it’s a fantastic no-fuss option with excellent portability. Thanks for your insightful feedback; it’s great to hear from users weighing these options!
I think the R50V is a great choice for anyone serious about video, especially with that redesign for better handling during recording. But if I were looking for something more compact just for casual vlogging and not planning to change lenses, the V1 could be an interesting option too. Still, it’s hard to beat the flexibility of the R50 for still photography.
Absolutely agree! The R50V really shines for videography with its improved ergonomics, while the V1’s portability makes it perfect for casual use. If stills are a priority, the R50 offers unmatched versatility. Each camera has its own charm—great options depending on what you value most! Thanks for sharing your thoughts!